Comments on: The 5th Commandment for Effective Standards http://blogs.synopsys.com/thestandardsgame/2009/02/the-5th-commandment-for-effective-standards/ "The Standards Game" features Karen’s perspective on what’s going on in the standards arena. Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:34:48 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2 By: Technology Forecasters, Inc. (TFI) | Strategic Environmental and Manufacturing Consulting http://blogs.synopsys.com/thestandardsgame/2009/02/the-5th-commandment-for-effective-standards/#comment-115 Technology Forecasters, Inc. (TFI) | Strategic Environmental and Manufacturing Consulting Fri, 06 Mar 2009 10:01:56 +0000 http://synopsysoc.org/thestandardsgame/?p=199#comment-115 [...] this standard could be challenging. Is it possible to have an objective standard? Enjoy this blog entry on the notion of “objective” standards. Can the standard be developed quickly enough to avoid [...] [...] this standard could be challenging. Is it possible to have an objective standard? Enjoy this blog entry on the notion of “objective” standards. Can the standard be developed quickly enough to avoid [...]

]]> By: Mike Mintz http://blogs.synopsys.com/thestandardsgame/2009/02/the-5th-commandment-for-effective-standards/#comment-114 Mike Mintz Mon, 09 Feb 2009 20:01:16 +0000 http://synopsysoc.org/thestandardsgame/?p=199#comment-114 Hi Karen, Right on! Everyone has an agenda. I was pretty shocked when I attended my first few standards meetings. I would have loved to have read your blog beforehand. Take Care, Mike Hi Karen,

Right on! Everyone has an agenda. I was pretty shocked when I attended my first few standards meetings.

I would have loved to have read your blog beforehand.

Take Care,
Mike

]]> By: harry the ASIC guy http://blogs.synopsys.com/thestandardsgame/2009/02/the-5th-commandment-for-effective-standards/#comment-113 harry the ASIC guy Fri, 06 Feb 2009 17:02:25 +0000 http://synopsysoc.org/thestandardsgame/?p=199#comment-113 Vote ... did someone say vote ;-) In all seriousness, with respect to the Accellera VIP TSC, I believe that OVM and VMM are just proxies for the respective vendors' simulation products. So there is obvious vested interest in the outcome. Given the state of the industry and economy, those battles have an even greater significance now. Or as they great philosopher <a href="http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Risky_Business#Guido" rel="nofollow">Guido the Killer Pimp once said</a>, "In a sluggish economy, never ever (mess) with another man's livelihood". Vote … did someone say vote ;-)

In all seriousness, with respect to the Accellera VIP TSC, I believe that OVM and VMM are just proxies for the respective vendors’ simulation products. So there is obvious vested interest in the outcome. Given the state of the industry and economy, those battles have an even greater significance now.

Or as they great philosopher Guido the Killer Pimp once said, “In a sluggish economy, never ever (mess) with another man’s livelihood”.

]]> By: karenb http://blogs.synopsys.com/thestandardsgame/2009/02/the-5th-commandment-for-effective-standards/#comment-112 karenb Fri, 06 Feb 2009 15:23:14 +0000 http://synopsysoc.org/thestandardsgame/?p=199#comment-112 JL, One can certainly do this. If willing to risk their own strategy being revealed, that is. That conversation is exhilarating. :) Karen JL,

One can certainly do this. If willing to risk their own strategy being revealed, that is. That conversation is exhilarating. :)

Karen

]]> By: JL Gray http://blogs.synopsys.com/thestandardsgame/2009/02/the-5th-commandment-for-effective-standards/#comment-111 JL Gray Thu, 05 Feb 2009 22:18:55 +0000 http://synopsysoc.org/thestandardsgame/?p=199#comment-111 So, would it be a standards faux pas if someone actually pointed out in public what side/strategy they felt everyone was taking? Then instead of arguing about things, we could have a vote and all go on vacation for the length of time of any desired delay :-). JL So, would it be a standards faux pas if someone actually pointed out in public what side/strategy they felt everyone was taking? Then instead of arguing about things, we could have a vote and all go on vacation for the length of time of any desired delay :-) .

JL

]]>