<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Interview with John Donovan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.synopsys.com/thelisteningpost/2010/01/an-interview-with-john-donovan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.synopsys.com/thelisteningpost/2010/01/an-interview-with-john-donovan/</link>
	<description>A G2G Social Media Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 18:28:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wednesday</title>
		<link>http://blogs.synopsys.com/thelisteningpost/2010/01/an-interview-with-john-donovan/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Wednesday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2011 20:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://synopsysoc.org/listeningG2G/?p=258#comment-38</guid>
		<description>N8fglt Good point. I hadn&#039;t thought about it quite that way. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>N8fglt Good point. I hadn&#8217;t thought about it quite that way. <img src='http://blogs.synopsys.com/thelisteningpost/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Blyler</title>
		<link>http://blogs.synopsys.com/thelisteningpost/2010/01/an-interview-with-john-donovan/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>John Blyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://synopsysoc.org/listeningG2G/?p=258#comment-37</guid>
		<description>This discussion just keeps going and going... Interestingly, it&#039;s not taking place on Facebook or an individual/publisher&#039;s blog. (At least, not this time.) But let&#039;s leave the ramifications of that observation for another time.

Yvette makes an key point about &quot;other&quot; business models. I&#039;ve been thinking along the same lines. It&#039;s pretty much a free-for-all at this point, where perhaps the greatest risk is thinking inside-the-box. Look for new business models as the year unfolds, not only from me (and Ed) but from others who are anxious to cross beyond traditional boundries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This discussion just keeps going and going&#8230; Interestingly, it&#8217;s not taking place on Facebook or an individual/publisher&#8217;s blog. (At least, not this time.) But let&#8217;s leave the ramifications of that observation for another time.</p>
<p>Yvette makes an key point about &#8220;other&#8221; business models. I&#8217;ve been thinking along the same lines. It&#8217;s pretty much a free-for-all at this point, where perhaps the greatest risk is thinking inside-the-box. Look for new business models as the year unfolds, not only from me (and Ed) but from others who are anxious to cross beyond traditional boundries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen Popp</title>
		<link>http://blogs.synopsys.com/thelisteningpost/2010/01/an-interview-with-john-donovan/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen Popp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 21:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://synopsysoc.org/listeningG2G/?p=258#comment-36</guid>
		<description>The other factor which continues to be important to companies are supporting web sites/print publications by voting with their advertising $$ is the issue of objectivity.  If a blogger is being paid by Mentor or Synopsys, where is the support for editorial objectivity?  I guarantee that if a paid blogger starts talking about how xxyyzz company is falling short for an extended period of time that at some point that company will ultimately vote differently, in terms of support.  Then where is that individual  blogger in terms of his bread and butter?  That is why Chip Design has been successful, so far.  The editorial staff remain independent from sales, although there is definitely a symbiotic relationship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The other factor which continues to be important to companies are supporting web sites/print publications by voting with their advertising $$ is the issue of objectivity.  If a blogger is being paid by Mentor or Synopsys, where is the support for editorial objectivity?  I guarantee that if a paid blogger starts talking about how xxyyzz company is falling short for an extended period of time that at some point that company will ultimately vote differently, in terms of support.  Then where is that individual  blogger in terms of his bread and butter?  That is why Chip Design has been successful, so far.  The editorial staff remain independent from sales, although there is definitely a symbiotic relationship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

