China 简体中文 Japan 日本语 United States English
International Office Locations
  HOME    COMMUNITY    BLOGS & FORUMS    The Listening Post
The Listening Post
  • About

    In the technology era, there are a million-and-one ways to connect with the world. With a million-and-one different needs and personalities, it is difficult to choose just one channel that will allow us to most effectively listen to and communicate with our customers and partners.

    Through the wisdom of experts and research by the authors, The Listening Post offers insights into a variety of aspects of today’s communication with a more specific focus on communicating effectively G2G (geek-to-geek).

  • About the Authors

    Darcy Pierce

    I’m actually just a kid trapped in a semi-adult body, I love cartoons, coloring and mac and cheese. I enjoy listening to Claire de Lune while taking ballet classes, but at the same time, a well-tuned muscle car is like music to my ears. I thrive on opportunities to spin what others find to be completely boring (or overly technical like microchips) into exciting and engaging marketing programs, because of this, Synopsys is my Disneyland and social media is my platform.

    Geeky Confession: I secretly love math and numbers. I can recall phone numbers after only a short glance, and for some reason find it necessary to memorize my credit card numbers.

    Hannah Watanabe

    The “jaw-dropper” fact that most people are surprised to learn is that I was homeschooled K-12. I have never regretted this, and in the end, I am still just your everyday California girl—can’t get enough beach or sun. Whether it’s a day trip to Santa Cruz, a weekend in L.A., or an adventure on the other side of the world, I love to travel. My favorite outdoor activity is camping, and my true love is tap dancing. Other than social media, my passion is working with children because I’m reminded of the days when a crisis was not getting a second cup of animal crackers at snack time.

    Geeky Confession: I occasionally spend an hour clicking on the ads on my Facebook page trying to figure out why they are targeting me. Then, I enter keywords into my profile in an attempt to capture ads that I’m actually interested in.

  • Archives

An Interview with Ron Ploof

Posted by rick jamison on August 10th, 2009

Ron Ploof is the founder of OC New Media, LLC, a consulting firm focused on helping business leaders understand  and develop strategies for incorporating social media into their communications programs. Ron is a blogger, author, speaker, and electrical engineer. He is also a Synopsys alumnus who launched the first social media-related initiatives at Synopsys as New Media Evangelist.

Ron recently hosted a session for Synopsys’ Conversation Central at DAC titled “Objectivity is Overrated: Corporate Bloggers Aren’t Journalists, and Why They Shouldn’t Even Try.” In the following conversation, Ron shares his perspective on that and other social media topics — and chats a bit about a new book he has written about how New Media technologies can be used to increase corporate communications effectiveness while reducing costs.

ron_ploof

Rick: How are corporate bloggers different from other online media sources, and why do you believe they shouldn’t strive for objectivity with their blogs?

Ron: There seems to be lots of emotion surrounding the whole “blogger” versus “journalist” thing. My session at  DAC was specifically targeted at corporate bloggers — communicators such as Karen Bartleson (Synopsys) or Bob Dwyer (Cadence). Since both are writing for their respective companies, I propose that there is no need to be “objective.”

By being published on their corporate sites, readers will naturally assume that their opinion is biased — and that is okay! Why would I listen to someone who doesn’t believe in their products or services? What value is it to me if a corporate blogger says something like, “our products are indistinguishable from that of our competition?” Seriously, would you stake your career on someone who didn’t believe in their own product?

Journalists are tasked with reporting news in an even-handed way. Their job is to get both sides of the story, report facts, and let the readers makeup their own minds. Since corporate bloggers aren’t under the same restrictions, they frequently become the targets of the “journalism police,” who question the validity of their content. But people love transparent biases. Although Bill Maher and Rush Limbaugh incite strong audience reactions through their openly left and right leaning opinions, their audiences appreciate the bias.

Rick: Blogs have proliferated at a staggering pace over a very short period of time. Is it possible that people are getting “blogged out?”

Ron: Most New/Social Media misconceptions stem from an inability to separate the concept of content from the channel that distributes it. Blogging is just a vehicle for delivering information, similar to a newspaper, a magazine, or broadcast channel. Newspapers have been around for many years. I dunno… was there a time when people got “newspapered out?”

People will always seek the best information from the best sources. If that information comes in the form of a blog, then so be it. If that information comes in the form of a podcast, online video, a magazine, a radio show or a teleconference, then that’s okay too!

Rick: What do companies that embrace social media understand that others don’t?

Ron: Companies embracing New/Social Media understand that the days of controlling the message are gone forever. In the past, one could write a press release or buy an advertisement — essentially holding a monopoly on their brand. Today, with the advent of blogging, podcasting, online video, Facebook and Twitter, those days are gone forever. Today, anyone with Internet access can tell their story in their own words, something that strikes fear into the hearts of traditional PR professionals and marketeers who can’t stand the thought of someone else talking loosely about their brand.

Companies that embrace these new communications vehicles trust that the quality of their products and services will speak for themselves. If my company has the best product on the market and someone trashes it online, I have faith that my fans will defend it in their own words. On the other hand, if my product is crappy, then it doesn’t matter how much time, effort, spin, or advertising dollars that I throw at it — the product will still be crappy.

The definition of hell is being a marketing manager for a crappy product in the age of social media.

Rick: You’re in the process of publishing a new book called “Read This First” – what’s it about and why did you write it?

Ron: Read This First: The Executive’s Guide to New Media from blogs to social networks presents an executive-level conversation that describes how New Media technologies can be used to simultaneously increase the effectiveness of corporate communications while reducing costs. It should be hitting the shelves in the fall.

I’ve had the chance to speak with hundreds of executives over the past few years and have learned that most don’t understand the basics of social media. I wrote Read This First to give executives a step-by-step way to evaluate these new communications vehicles. Instead of looking at the problem from a traditional marketing or public relations perspective, I chose to approach the topic from the customer’s perspective. By looking at the problem from the other side, my book aims to put companies into the proper mindset to create content that helps their customers instead of the traditional way — interrupting them!

VN:F [1.9.8_1114]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Print
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Buzz
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS

One Response to “An Interview with Ron Ploof”

  1. Ron Ploof says:

    Thanks for the opportunity, Rick. The post came out great!

    VA:F [1.9.8_1114]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>