<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rapid Prototyping &amp; Core vs. Context</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.synopsys.com/softwaretosiliconverification/2009/02/rapid-prototyping-core-vs-context/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.synopsys.com/softwaretosiliconverification/2009/02/rapid-prototyping-core-vs-context/</link>
	<description>Tom Borgstrom explores software-to-silicon verification.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 16:46:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tborgstrom</title>
		<link>http://blogs.synopsys.com/softwaretosiliconverification/2009/02/rapid-prototyping-core-vs-context/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>tborgstrom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://synopsysoc.org/softwaretosiliconverification/?p=11#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Harry,

It will be great to see you at DVCon! For the breakfast session, Ken will be talking about how prototypes can bring HW and SW together earlier to shorten verification schedules for the complete HW+SW product.  Should be a great session for all the early risers!

I agree we&#039;ve got a lot of work to do to sort out the terminology associated with prototyping and hardware-assisted verification.  Hmmm...perhaps an idea for a new blog post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harry,</p>
<p>It will be great to see you at DVCon! For the breakfast session, Ken will be talking about how prototypes can bring HW and SW together earlier to shorten verification schedules for the complete HW+SW product.  Should be a great session for all the early risers!</p>
<p>I agree we&#8217;ve got a lot of work to do to sort out the terminology associated with prototyping and hardware-assisted verification.  Hmmm&#8230;perhaps an idea for a new blog post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: harry the ASIC guy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.synopsys.com/softwaretosiliconverification/2009/02/rapid-prototyping-core-vs-context/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>harry the ASIC guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 07:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://synopsysoc.org/softwaretosiliconverification/?p=11#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Hi Tom,

I&#039;m looking forward to finding out more details at DVCon, especially how all these pieces play together. Is this part of what you&#039;ll be covering in your &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dvcon.org/html/breakfast.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Wed AM breakfast session&lt;/a&gt;?

One aspect that has always caused me some confusion is terminology. Accelerator. Emulator. Prototype. Virtual prototype. Virtual Platform. And some technologies seem to handle more than one purpose. Perhaps it would be worthwhile to clarify these so we at least have a common vocabulary.

Cheers,

Harry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tom,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m looking forward to finding out more details at DVCon, especially how all these pieces play together. Is this part of what you&#8217;ll be covering in your <a href="http://www.dvcon.org/html/breakfast.html" rel="nofollow">Wed AM breakfast session</a>?</p>
<p>One aspect that has always caused me some confusion is terminology. Accelerator. Emulator. Prototype. Virtual prototype. Virtual Platform. And some technologies seem to handle more than one purpose. Perhaps it would be worthwhile to clarify these so we at least have a common vocabulary.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Harry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

